Legal Opinion

Blacksher v. Leh

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1916No. 20963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; B. H. Pavy, Judge. Executory process by Patton T. Blacksher against R. R. Leh, and the receivers of the Union Irrigation Company filed a petition in intervention and third opposition. From the judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The plaintiff instituted ex-ecutory proceedings to collect 15 promissory notes of ?6,000 each, secured by mortgage and vendor’s lien on certain lands which he had sold to the defendant, Leh. In addition to the land described in the petition for ex-ecutory process, the sheriff seized certain movable property, consisting of horses, mules, farming implements, and about 600 sacks of rice that had been harvested.

The receivers of the Union Irrigation Company filed a petition of intervention and third opposition, claiming that the horses, mules, farming implements, and rice belonged to the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Evangelist Baptist Church v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API