Legal Opinion

State v. West

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1976No. 761SC288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

It appears that plaintiff complied with G.S. 1A-1, Rule 7 (b) (1), requiring that motions made prior to a hearing or trial be in writing, and G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c) relating to service of motions for summary judgment. The record does not reveal that defendant filed affidavits in opposition to plaintiff’s motion.

Under Rule 56(e)

“[w]hen a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his plead*436ing, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Bartholomew v. StaheliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. State v. BellarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty of New York v. LentNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  5. United States v. MalleryDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willcox v. StroupCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. JosephHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. WEST DAUPHIN LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Callon Offshore Prod., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. United States v. Letter From Alexander HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API