Legal Opinion

Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc., John Fromm and Peter Pfeffer v. Ronald P. Hlavinka and Jimmie G. Davison

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 16, 1990No. 89-2265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In December 1983, respondent Ronald Hlavinka initiated a reparations action before the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under Section 14 of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) (codified at 7 U.S.C. § 18) against petitioners Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc. and its employees, John Fromm and Peter Pfeffer, complaining that he had lost $27,500 1 in trading silver futures contracts. Hlavinka claimed that this corporate registered futures commission merchant and its employees had given him false information in violation of the anti-fraud provision of the CEA (7 U.S.C. § 6b).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Ronald P. Hlavinka v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Blunt Ellis & Loewi, Inc. v. HlavinkaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. North American Globex Fund, L.P.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Hlavinka v. Blunt, Ellis & Loewi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. North Central F.S., Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  4. Farmers Co-Operative Elevator, Woden, Iowa v. DodenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API