Legal Opinion

In re Mayo Contracting Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 20, 1907No. 11,271PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On petition for review of order of referee disallowing claims of William A. Norton.

1Opinion of the Court

DODGE, District Judge.

The petitioner sought to prove two claims against this estate. One was for a balance of account amounting to $2,131.18. The account began in June, 1902. The bankrupt was charged in it for piles supplied and teaming done at various dates between June, 1902, and August, 1905, in all $18,349.40. It was credited with piling returned and various payments by chedc on account; the last being November 13, 1905, amounting in all to $16,218.22. The othér claim offered for proof was also for piles supplied to the bankrupt; but the piles included in this claim were all furnished…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardy v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re StewartDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  2. Chisholm v. First National Bank of LeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Chisholm v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API