Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Claver v. Broute

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1923Published

1Dissent

Bronson, Oh. J.

(dissenting). I most earnestly dissent. The parties on this appeal stipulated that the only question for the supreme court to pass upon is the constitutionality of the statute. Appellant in its brief specifically waived the question of the validity of the proceedings to disconnect the respondent’s land. Nevertheless, the majority opinion refuses to discuss the merits. It reverses the decision of the trial court upon a' technical procedural ground that certiorari is not the appropriate remedy. In so doing it violates well settled rules of pro*762cedure and reverses tlie trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brissman v. ThistlethwaiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. StutsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Shuman v. LesmeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Mogaard v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API