Legal Opinion

Harp v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1949No. 3794PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Section 1 of the Act of June 30, 1936, 49 Stat. 2036, 41 U.S.C.A. § 35 et seq., commonly called the Walsh-Healey Act, provides in presently material part that in any contract made and entered into by any executive department, independent establishment, or other agency or instrumentality of the United States, for the manufacture or furnishing of materials and supplies in any amount exceeding $10,000 there shall be included a provision that no female person under eighteen years of age will be employed by the contractor in the manufacture or production or furnishing of any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Waste Removal Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Sancolmar Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. United States v. New York Dock Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. United States v. Sweet Briar, Inc.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950
  5. Lewis v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API