Legal Opinion

United States v. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 5196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, District Judge.

The plaintiff, The United States of America, brings this action against St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company charging the defendant with violating certain provi sions of the Safety Appliance Act, as amended,1 and asks for $100 on each of the the three causes of action.

In its first cause of action the plaintiff alleges that the defendant on May 31, 1951, operated a diesel drawn train of nineteen cars in interstate commerce, in and about Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, “when none of the cars in said train had their brakes used and operated by the engineer of the locomotive…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Jeffersonville Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. United States v. Gulf, M. & O.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. Elgin, J. & E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. South Buffalo R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Neuhoff Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Neuhoff Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API