Tate v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The demurrer to the indictment was properly overruled.
The 1st special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges that the court erred in admitting in evidence an insurance policy issued by the Eoyal Insurance Company, covering the sainé property insured by the Hartford Insurance Company, because to admit in evidence a policy of another company was both immaterial and irrelevant to the issues involved, and because said defendant was charged with attempting to defraud a specifically named company. “To admit another policy in another company not named in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Hays v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Barrow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- McDaniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Yeargin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982