Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Him v. Reimer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1940No. 31PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The applicant has been excluded from admission to the United States because he failed to prove his citizenship. He asserted that the relator, concededly a citizen, was his father; and the question, as always in these cases, was whether the proof was so indisputable that a denial of his paternity could only have proceeded from an entire disregard of the evidence, and an arbitrary disposition not to hear the case upon the merits. The witnesses were examined in great detail as to the Chinese village from which they came, but their testimony developed no substantial inconsistencies. The Board…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Fong on v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. United States ex rel. Eng Fon Sing v. UhlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API