State Ex Rel. Citydeck Landing LLC v. Circuit Court for Brown Cnty.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).
¶45 Until now, it has been well settled that a supervisory writ is intended to be "an extraordinary and drastic remedy[,]" reserved for rare situations involving "some grievous exigency." State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cty., 2004 WI 58, ¶ 17, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110 ; see Matter of Civil Contempt of Kroll, 101 Wis. 2d 296, 304, 304 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1981) (denominating a supervisory writ an "extraordinary remed[y]"); State ex rel. Kenneth S. v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cty., 2008 WI App 120, ¶ 8, 313 Wis. 2d 508, 756 N.W.2d 573 (referring…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IVWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Oman v. HunkinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State ex rel. Kiekhaefer v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.