Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Citydeck Landing LLC v. Circuit Court for Brown Cnty.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2019No. 2018AP000291-WPublished

1Dissent

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).

¶45 Until now, it has been well settled that a supervisory writ is intended to be "an extraordinary and drastic remedy[,]" reserved for rare situations involving "some grievous exigency." State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cty., 2004 WI 58, ¶ 17, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110 ; see Matter of Civil Contempt of Kroll, 101 Wis. 2d 296, 304, 304 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1981) (denominating a supervisory writ an "extraordinary remed[y]"); State ex rel. Kenneth S. v. Circuit Ct. for Dane Cty., 2008 WI App 120, ¶ 8, 313 Wis. 2d 508, 756 N.W.2d 573 (referring…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Cintas Corp. No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IVWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. Oman v. HunkinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Kiekhaefer v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API