Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Wells

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 1953No. 4-9990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

The question now presented is whether the Circuit Court was correct in holding that the appellant’s remedy was a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, rather than an action at law for damages.

Appellant, Bobby Lynn Wallace, was employed by appellee Wells at the latter’s service station in El Dorado; and in the course of such employment, Wallace received serious and painful burns on August 25, 1948. Wells carried Workmen’s Compensation Insurance, and had Wallace hospitalized and treated for many months, and voluntarily1 paid him the amounts prescribed under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Brooks v. ClaywellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Metcalf v. JelksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Mosley v. Mohawk Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Shephard v. HopsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Aerial Crop Care, Inc. v. LandrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Stone v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Sudler v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1969
  5. Baratta's Italian Restaurant v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API