Legal Opinion

Granda v. Siegendorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 15, 1979No. 79-348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We are confident that it will be unnecessary for this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus and that the respondent judicial referee upon receipt of this opinion will comply with this court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diggett v. ConklingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Hewitt v. CaffeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Grossman v. DuncanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cole v. Angora Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API