Awtry v. Hilman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
Motion to add interest to verdict.
The verdict in this action was rendered on defendants’ counterclaim against plaintiff. The counterclaim was based on a cause of action in contract, for money paid by defendants to a third party for and on behalf of the plaintiff.
The evidence shows that the parties were copartners doing business in Texas; that the copartnership, at the time of its .dissolution, was indebted to a Texas corporation, and that, under the Texas law, the defendants were compelled to pay their share of the indebtedness, as well as plaintiff’s share, and were given a right of action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- J. B. Preston Co. v. FunkhouserNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Victor Refining Co. v. City National Bank of CommerceTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Jones v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Colligan v. CaprioNassau County District Court · 1964
- Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958