Legal Opinion

Awtry v. Hilman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

Motion to add interest to verdict.

The verdict in this action was rendered on defendants’ counterclaim against plaintiff. The counterclaim was based on a cause of action in contract, for money paid by defendants to a third party for and on behalf of the plaintiff.

The evidence shows that the parties were copartners doing business in Texas; that the copartnership, at the time of its .dissolution, was indebted to a Texas corporation, and that, under the Texas law, the defendants were compelled to pay their share of the indebtedness, as well as plaintiff’s share, and were given a right of action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sokoloff v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. J. B. Preston Co. v. FunkhouserNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Victor Refining Co. v. City National Bank of CommerceTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Jones v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Colligan v. CaprioNassau County District Court · 1964
  3. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  4. Farnsworth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API