Suede Pillow Novelty Co. v. Dworsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The sole question for the learned official referee was: Are any additional moneys due Dworskys over the agreed sum of $266.08? If so, may they hold the collateral for their *49payment, in addition to such agreed sum? The referee upheld the Dworskys as to both items claimed as further fees for collection and counsel fee, in his report. The court confirmed the report. Nevertheless the order entered thereon was not conformable to the decision. It provided that the appellants be directed to turn over the collateral accounts receivable upon a payment which did not include the sums the referee found…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. LambertAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974