Union Central Life Insurance v. Trundle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
Movant insists that the court has overlooked certain statutes and legal principles and decisions of our courts which are controlling, and that the ruling when the case was here on a former appearance (61 Ga. App. 110, supra) is likewise controlling, adversely to the opinion in the instant case, and that a different judgment should have been rendered.
1. This subdivision of the motion is prefatory only.
2, 3. Movant insists "that the former decision of the court, on proper issues presented, held: (1) that there was no such refusal to pay on the part of the company as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wellborn v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Blackwell v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Savannah Electric Co. v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Fuller v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Union Central Life Insurance v. TrundleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.