Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bull

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1993No. 1157PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver 1 and conspiracy to possess controlled substances with intent to deliver. 2 Appellant, Ronald Bull, presents the following claims:

I. The opinion testimony of the drug enforcement officer was insufficient to make out a case of possession with intent to deliver, when there was no other indicia of delivery capability.

II. The police violated Rule 2007 in waiting but one, or two seconds after knocking and announcing their identity, authority and purpose before breaking down…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CortezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. DialSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. RudisillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. State v. OgdenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. WagstaffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Com. v. Freeman, M. A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API