Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Denham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1967No. 24171, 24172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moblby, Justice.

It is the general rule that debts of a testator shall be paid, first, from the property charged with the debts by the terms of the will; and, unless otherwise directed by the will, next, from the residuum or the undevised estate; next, from general legacies, which shall abate pro rata; and, finally, specific legacies shall contribute. Code §§ 113-821, 113-1509. No provision was made for the payment of debts in the will construed by the judgment under review.

It is conceded by the appellants in the main appeal that a legacy accepted by a widow under a will in lieu of dower and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. In Re Estate of HartmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Tinsley v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Clayton v. AkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  5. Barmore v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DuBose v. BoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Killingsworth v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. DuBose v. BoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API