Legal Opinion

Scruggs v. Keen

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided July 19, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-0015-D-RPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KISER, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of the defendants Leonard Gereau, William Gibson, and the School Board of Franklin County (the “school board defendants”) for summary judgment. .These defendants previously filed a summary judgment prior to the commencement of discovery, which I denied. The parties have briefed the issues involved in the renewed motion and the Court heard arguments of counsel. The school board defendants’ motion is, therefore, ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

FACTS:

Plainti…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Silverman v. Town of BlackstoneDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
  3. Williams v. MorrisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996
  4. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 85 v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 85 v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API