Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Fair

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 18, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Wallace, J., Richland, This was an action by W. C. Fisher against Mary D. Fair and J. Q. Marshall, to recover damages for the obstruction of an alley way.

Read the full summary

Before Wallace, J., Richland, This was an action by W. C. Fisher against Mary D. Fair and J. Q. Marshall, to recover damages for the obstruction of an alley way. The case turns principally upon the construction of the following deed: This indenture witnesseth that Samuel Fair agrees to allow Thomas Davis to have for himself and his heirs and assigns, forever, a right of way by an alley ten feet wide, over the northern edge of the lot in the town of Columbia, on the northern side of Plain street, and bounded on the east by Sumter street, into which the said alley is to run; and said Samuel…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

*205

Mr. Justice McIver.

This was an action to recover damages for the obstruction of an alleged right of way over the lands of defendants, and to perpetually enjoin the defendants from obstructing the same. The diagram annexed to the “Case” shows distinctly the situation of the premises and the course of the way claimed by the plaintiff, and should be incorporated in the report of this case. It is sufficient to state generally that the alleged way is an alley. between adjacent lots in the city of Columbia, plaintiff being the owner of the two lots…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Solana Land Co. v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Kershaw v. BurnsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  5. Bruns v. WillemsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API