Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. National Transportation Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 9, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The action is by plaintiff, a taxi chauffeur, employed by the Marsack Transportation Company, to recover damages of the defendants National Transportation Co., Inc., and Morris Schitzken for injuries sustained in the course of his employment. Pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law plaintiff filed an election to sue these defendants. Hearing *759before the Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation has been adjourned pending the outcome of this action against the third parties.

By chapter 259 of the Laws of 1932, there was added to section 138 of the Civil Practice Act — the section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Morse v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Yorkshire Insurance v. Raw Fur & Skin Trading Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weinberg v. National Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API