Legal Opinion
Maroney v. Cole
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Motion fo set aside a verdict and for a new trial
1Opinion of the Court
O’Dwyer, Ch. J.
The defendants object that the paper offered in evidence over their exception and claimed to be *452an assignment of the claim of the Aster Company, a corporation, is not in due form; that it is imperfect as an instrument of transfer, and that there is no proof that the execution of the' paper was authorized by the corporation or its board of directors. The paper is undated and in form following: “ For value received we hereby sell, assign and transfer to Edward Maroney all our right, title and interest in and to the annexed account of Cole & Woop. Signed. Aster Co., by A. Epstein,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Quackenboss v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Marvin v. . WilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Jackson ex dem. Ballou v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1830
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
- Moroney v. ColeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907