Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Security Union Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1929No. 7388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

Appeal from a judgment upon a directed verdict denying appellant recovery in an action under the Employers’ Liability Law (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 8306— 8309).

Appellee was the insurer of L. E. Whitham & Co., a corporation, and the only question the appeal presents is whether the evidence would support a finding that McLeod was an employee of the insured.

The evidence will admit of the following findings: Whitham & Co. — engaged in constructing street paving in San Angelo— controlled a gravel pit oh the Concho river some 4½ miles from the paving work, and reached by a private road…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. LightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. CulvahouseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Security Union Ins. Co. v. McLeodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Haden Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Hicks v. Southern Ohio Quarries Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Texas Electric Service Co. v. KinkeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API