Legal Opinion

State v. Lancaster County Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from tbe district court for Lancaster county.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

Tbe’judgment in tbis case is as follows: “It is therefore considered by tbe court (the defendant, by its attorney general, consenting thereto), that tbe said plaintiff, tbe Lancaster County Bank, have and recover from said defendant, tbe state of Nebraska, tbe said sum of five thousand and sixty-seven and fifteen one-hundredths dollars debt, and thirty-two and forty-seven one-hundredths dollars costs, and that said judg*219ment draw interest at the rate of ten per cent from date.”

The state, by T. M. Marquett, its special attorney, brings the case into this court by petition in error.

The errors…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. StoutNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catania v. University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hern v. Iowa State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Durbridge v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Semrad v. SemradNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bow v. PlummerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API