Legal Opinion
Stransky v. Tannenbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, etc., (1) the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), entered April 6, 1998, as denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same order, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to serve a supplemental verified bill of particulars.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendants’ cross motion was properly denied as untimely under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Stroock v. BeltraminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Phoenix Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Scarangello v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Dos v. ScelsaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hill v. 2016 Realty AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Perry v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kaminski v. Modern Italian Bakery of West BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001