Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
In this breach of contract case, the Court must now determine the proper amount owed to Plaintiff, SUFI Network Services, Inc. (“SUFI”), for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and interest. The origins of this ease lie in an April 26, 1996 contract between SUFI and the U.S. Air Force Nonappropriated Funds Purchasing Office (“AFNAFPO,” or “Air Force”) to provide telephone services on Air Force bases in Germany. SUFI Network Servs., Inc. v. United States, 102 Fed.Cl. 656, 658 (2012) (“SUFI CFC I’’). 1 SUFI first litigated its underlying contract claims before the Armed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scharfenberger v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Swintosky v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Zuidema, Jr. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016