Lathrope v. Flood
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; William B. Daingerfield, Judge. Action by Margaret A. Lathrope and another against P. H. Flood. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs the defendant appeals. Affirmed.'
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action against a physician to recover damages for the alleged injuries occasioned by his negligent and unskillful treatment of his patient, and for injuries resulting from the violation of his contract of em*638ployment in abandoning her case, and leaving her, in a critical period, without proper or any medical attendance. The case was tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,000. This appeal is taken from the judgment and from the order denying the defendant a new trial.
The defendant, P. H. Flood,' a practicing physician in San Francisco, was employed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawson v. ConawayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ritchey v. WestIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Barbour v. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Cazzell v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Lee v. DewbreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Burnett v. LaymanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Lee v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.