Legal Opinion

Faraclas v. Faraclas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1964No. 251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam,

The appellant, a husband who seeks to avoid the stigma of having been judicially declared to have been an adulterer, and the necessity of continuing to support his wife, bases his claim to a reversal on a printed record extract of some four hundred forty pages of testimony and exhibits. Our examination of the extract and our consideration of the earnest and detailed arguments of counsel for the appellant, both printed and forensic, leaves us convinced that the persuasion of the trial judge, after a fourteen-day trial, that the husband and his paramour had both the inclination to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallis v. FaraclasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Dorsey v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API