Gulkis v. New York Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.
This is an action based on a double indemnity provision. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the provision specifically excludes a case such as this where the assured has concededly died from an overdose of morphine, codeine and barbiturates, even if accidental as contended by plaintiff.
The policy states: ‘ ‘ Double Indemnity shall not be payable if the Insured’s death resulted from self-destruction, whether sane or insane; from the taking of poison or inhaling of gas, whether voluntary or otherwise ’ ’. It is clear from the express use of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Diamond v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Pixley v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Feldstein v. New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Feldstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940