Legal Opinion

Gulkis v. New York Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1955Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.

This is an action based on a double indemnity provision. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the provision specifically excludes a case such as this where the assured has concededly died from an overdose of morphine, codeine and barbiturates, even if accidental as contended by plaintiff.

The policy states: ‘ ‘ Double Indemnity shall not be payable if the Insured’s death resulted from self-destruction, whether sane or insane; from the taking of poison or inhaling of gas, whether voluntary or otherwise ’ ’. It is clear from the express use of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mansbacher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Diamond v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Pixley v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Feldstein v. New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Feldstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API