Eddington v. City Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case. Claimant, Floyd Eddington, was denied compensation by the full commission, and this finding -was approved by the circuit court.
On appeal to this Court we are asked to resolve only one issue: Is the finding of the full commission (as approved by the circuit court) supported by substantial evidence? If it is so supported it is our duty to affirm the judgment of the trial court—as is established by decisions too numerous to require mention. What constitutes substantial evidence is a question of law. See: Boyd Excelsior Fuel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Pittman Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Boyd Excelsior Fuel Company v. McKownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Cummings v. United Motor Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Clark v. Ottenheimer BrothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pifer v. Single Source TransportationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Collins v. Excel Specialty ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Wallace v. West Fraser South, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- O. K. Processing, Inc. v. ServoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Harris Cattle Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.