Legal Opinion

Walters v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1910No. 110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

The first count in the information charges that appellant did unlawfully go into and remain in the house of Matilda Hagan, alias Matilda Brown, said house then and there being a gambling-house, as the said Joe Walters then and there well knew, against the peace and dignity of the State. The second count charges that appellant did then and there unlawfully remain in a place, to wit: the house of Matilda Hagan, alias Matilda Brown, where a game of cards was then and there being unlawfully played at by Tom Scott and Samson Johnson, as the said Joe Walters then and there well knew,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Hanks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Purvis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eureka County Bank Habeas Corpus CasesNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Fridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Pythian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API