Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Doe v. X Corp.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 26, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-475-APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

I

Can a corporate house counsel properly act as a relator in a qui tam action against his former employer?

This is the novel question presented in what is the third and final chapter in an unusual saga that has spawned three actions, including the instant qui tam action. The first two chapters of the saga arose in the context of the former employer’s suit for injunctive relief to prevent the former house counsel employee from disclosing confidential documents and information obtained by the corporate house counsel during the course of his employment. In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Civil Liberties Union v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Fair Laboratory Practices Assocs. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. In Re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
  4. ACLU v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  5. American Civil Liberties Union v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API