Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Insurance v. P.B. Hoidale Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 87-1384-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BELOT, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company (“Employers”) for an order disqualifying the law firm of McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herring-ton, P.A. (“McDonald, Tinker” or “Respondent”) as counsel for plaintiff. (Doc. 278). The court held a hearing in this matter on January 16, 1992. Having heard the testimony, received exhibits, and reviewed the parties’ memoranda in support of their respective positions, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Fullmer v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Alvin W. Fullmer v. George Harper, Individually and as PresidentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Lansing-Delaware Water District v. Oak Lane Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Parker v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Graham v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowe v. ExperianDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Barragree v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Oxford Systems, Inc. v. CellPro, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1999
  4. Baker v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. Regent Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API