Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Siegel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 30, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is a motion by the trustee pursuant to section 233 of the Tax Law to compromise and irrevocably fix the tax on the contingent remainders of three trusts created by the will. The testator died February 5, 1922, and the original pro forma order assessing tax was made on April 7, 1924. That order computed the highest possible tax on the contingent remainders in question at the sum of $4,038.56 and likewise computed the tax that would be due, if the various life beneficiaries had died, at the date of appraisal, at $2,457.08. Pursuant to that order and the provisions of sections 230…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of WolfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of LauderdaleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of BryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DevlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  2. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of ParkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API