Legal Opinion

Huckaba v. Huckaba

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 11, 1976No. Civ. 792PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a divorce case.

The issues on appeal are: Did the trial court err to reversal in its award of alimony and in requiring the appellant-husband to pay certain expenses for an adult child? We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The original decree in pertinent part ordered the husband to pay $350 per month alimony. The home and furnishings were awarded to the wife. In addition, the husband was required to pay the debts of the parties. The husband retained three house trailers and forty acres of land.

Additionally, the husband was ordered to pay all expenses for his nineteen year old…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Sellers v. SellersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Helms v. HelmsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Hardiman v. HardimanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BaylissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ralls v. RallsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Davenport v. DavenportCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. Hughes v. HughesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API