Legal Opinion

A New Leaf, Inc. v. Webb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 8, 1999No. Record 980454PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

In this appeal, we decide whether allergic contact dermatitis is compensable as an occupational disease under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act). Because the claimant’s contact dermatitis was caused by a reaction to allergens in certain flowers and not by cumulative trauma induced by repetitive motion, we will affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals that the condition is compensable under the Act.

I

Elaine Ruth Webb has been employed by A New Leaf, Inc. (A New Leaf), as a florist since October 1993. In 1994, she became the store’s senior florist. Her responsibilities included…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Stenrich Group v. JemmottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  3. Merillat Industries, Inc. v. ParksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  4. A New Leaf, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ogden Aviation Services v. SaghyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  2. City of Portsmouth Sheriff's Department v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  3. Pro-Football, Inc., et.al. v. Jeffrey A. UhlenhakeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. FAIRFAX COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE v. MottramSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Larry George Snellings v. Stafford County Fire and Rescue DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API