Legal Opinion

Wilt v. Moody

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 9, 1953No. 42876PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

254 S.W.2d 15 (1953)

WILT

v.

MOODY.

No. 42876.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

January 9, 1953.

Kelso Journey, Clinton, William J. Cason, Clinton, for plaintiff-appellant.

Poague, Poague & Brock, Haysler A. Poague and Barkley M. Brock, Clinton, Roy Jones, Warrensburg, for respondent.

ELLISON, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant motorist Wilt sued the defendant-respondent Moody, and another defendant McMillan, for $15,000 damages under Sections 537.080, 537.090 RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S., for the wrongful death of his wife, who was riding with him, in a double motor car collision on State Highway 13. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Pulitzer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Rouchene v. Gamble Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Branson v. Abernathy Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Machens v. MachensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Welch v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. White v. BurkeybileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Levin v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. PrughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API