Gray v. Currier
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
These two actions of contract were tried together. Gray sued for the agreed price of sinking a well. Mrs. Currier brought a cross action for damages caused by delay of Gray in completing the work. Verdicts in favor of Gray were returned in both actions and the cases are before us upon exceptions of Mrs. Currier to the admission and exclusion of evidence and to portions of the charge to the jury.
The contract, which was dated September 26, 1921, was in writing and was drawn up by Gray after negotiation between his son Leland, acting for him, and Mr. Currier, *80acting for his wife. 11 provided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lent v. PadelfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Wallis v. Inhabitants of WenhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Hathaway v. ShalomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Callahan v. Fleischman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Morgan v. Town of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Humphreys v. J. B. Michael & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Hartigan v. Eastern Racing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.