Legal Opinion

Neiman v. City of New York Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The defendant first perfected its appeal, and is designated as -the appellant.

The facts are not in dispute. The appellant introduced no testimony. The policy was issued, to one Danenbaum, covering certain equiiiment and merchandise in a bakery. Thereafter, the business conducted by Danenbaum was consoli- ' ■ dated with that of another concern, and. title to the insured property was transferred to the Electric Bakery Company, a corporation. Following this, the property of the Electric Bakery Company, including that covered by the policy, was transferred to the ap-pellee, as trustee for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hollis v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Stone v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Hagan v. Merchants & Bankers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. Bloom v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. RuddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Association of Kiron, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark v. BurnquistDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  3. Smith v. Liberty Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Venz v. State Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Morris v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API