Legal Opinion
Clayborne v. Lithia Motors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 5, 2021No. 1:17-cv-00588Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 TONY CLAYBORNE, CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00588-AWI-BAM 7 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 8 v. TO DISMISS 9 LITHIA MOTORS, INC., et al., (Doc. No. 44) 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 This case currently proceeds on a single cause of action for civil penalties under 15 California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”),
Cal. Lab. Code § 2698, et seq. That 16 PAGA claim belongs to Plaintiff Troy Clayborne and is premised on wage statement violations 17 under California Labor Code § 226(a). Defendants Lithia Motors, Inc., and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.