Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Clarke v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 11, 1998No. 1970242Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMaddox, Justice

I concur in that portion of the main opinion affirming the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals insofar as it relates to the plaintiffs’ claims alleging bad-faith failure to pay an insurance claim, the tort of outrage, and conspiracy. I must dissent from that portion reversing as to the breach-of-contract, misrepresentation, and suppression claims. The main opinion states that “the record contains substantial evidence indicating that Allstate had not mailed or delivered the endorsement.” 728 So.2d at 140.

Once a defendant moving for a summary judgment makes a prima facie showing that no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Murdoch v. Knollwood Park Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API