Legal Opinion
Rosenbaum v. United States Credit System Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 13, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On rule to show cause.-
1Opinion of the Court
*35The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
Tins is a suit for wages by Rosenbaum against the above-named defendant, founded upon an agreement in writing by which the defendant company appointed the plaintiff as its agent for the term of five years from December 1st, 1892, for the purpose of procuring credit insurance in the State of Massachusetts.
The company agreed to pay Rosenbaum as compensation for his services as such agent a certain specified sum on the amount of such insurance procured by him, and Rosenbaum on his part agreed to procure a certain amount of business for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Beebe v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Claflin v. United States Credit System Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. KeenanTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Wolff v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Elwell v. Adder Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.