Legal Opinion
Ewell v. Weagley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1926No. 2485PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in the District Court and will be referred'to here as the plaintiff. The defendants Clinton B. Weagley and M. Frank Holter are the executors, and the defendants H. Helen Kefauver and Olive P. Kefauver, the wife and daughter-in-law, of D. Edward Kefauver, deceased. The declaration states in substance that the deceased advertised a farm for sale, stated ■in the advertisement to contain 124 acres, and offered to sell it for $175 per acre; that the plaintiff saw the advertisement and the deceased offered to sell the land…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- White v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Powell v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Higinbotham v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Barbour v. TompkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Doe ex dem. Phillips' Heirs v. PorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1840
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Interest of B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hild v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Gary N. Fields v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995