Legal Opinion
Zillmer v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 12, 1955No. Civ. A. Nos. 5120, 5149PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
These actions are before the Court for decision on stipulated facts. The actions are identical and stipulation covers both, the actions having been consolidated by order of the Court for purpose of taking testimony and stipulation having been substituted for the testimony.
The record and the stipulation show that the plaintiffs are co-partners and attorneys. On July 2, 1940, plaintiffs, together with Attorney A. J. Pellette, were employed as attorneys for the trustees of the Plankinton Building Company, it then being in reorganization in this Court under Chapter 10 of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smart v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Cowan v. Henslee, Collector of Internal Revenue. Klein v. Henslee, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Lindstrom v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Thompson Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Van Hook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raymond T. Zillmer v. United States of America, John M. Redford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Williamson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1961