Legal Opinion

Yost v. Dunk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1914No. 8,413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Tippecanoe Circuit Court; Bichará P. DeHart, Judge. Action by Rachael Dunk on a claim for services against the estate of David Yost, deceased. From a judgment for claimant, Charles W. Yost, administrator, appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

Action by appellee upon the following claim filed against the estate of appellant’s decedent:

“Estate of David Yost, deceased, to Rachel Dunk, Dr. To board and washing, nursing, care and attention in sickness and in health of David Yost, from April, 1902, to the date of his death, November 26, 1910, continuously, one hundred four (104) months, at — Seventeen dollars ($17.00) per month...............$1,768.00”

Decedent was claimant’s father. Briefly, the evidence shows that claimant for a few years prior to her marriage kept house for her father. After her marriage she removed to a separate farm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forgerson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hill v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. PerkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Dearing v. CoulsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Myers v. ManloveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osterhaus v. CrevistonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Rodebaugh v. RodebaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API