Legal Opinion

Estate of Matteson v. Matteson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 10, 2007No. 2005AP2607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. In Lange v. Bartlett, 121 Wis. 2d 599, 602, 360 N.W.2d 702 (Ct. App. 1984), we explained that when one partner leaves a partnership and allows the other to continue the business, the departing partner is entitled to receive, in addition to a share of the value of the business, a share of the profits until the business is wound up. We also held that the continuing partner is entitled to be compensated for work done during this time. Id. at 606. This case requires us to address in more detail the calculation of the outgoing partner's profit share and the continuing partner's labor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bader v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Timmermann v. TimmermannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gull v. Van EppsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. First National Bank of Kenosha v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Lange v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Matteson v. MattesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Western Surety Co. v. Alliance Steel Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API