Legal Opinion

United States v. Landsberger

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1982No. Civ. 3-81-313PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RENNER, District Judge.

Before the Court are the Government’s motions for: (1) Summary judgment of permanent injunction; and (2) to hold defendant in contempt for violation of preliminary injunction. Larry Meuwissen, Esq. and James P. Sites, Esq., appear for the government and Gerald J. Landsberger, defendant, appears pro se.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant is the promoter of a plan which he calls the “Foreign Tax Haven Double Trust.” Under the plan, one “sells” his lifetime services as an employee to a trust called Professional and Technical Services. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Harrison v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon S. ButtorffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Gerald J. LandsbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Benningfield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  4. United States v. Ernst & WhinneyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Benningfield v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API