Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mehlum v. Nunda Cooperative Ass'n

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1952No. File 9289Published

1DissentLeedom, J.

I think the award made by the Industrial Commissioner and affirmed by the circuit court should be sustained. In my opinion the circumstances of the fall and the medical testimony support the award under the valid and prevailing rule in compensation cases. Compare Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co., 172 Minn. 439, 215 N.W. 678; Hiber v. City of St. Paul, 219 Minn. 87, 16 N.W.2d 878; Dean v. Benton Harbor-St. Joe Ry. & Light Co., 231 Mich. 23, 203 N.W. 952; McVicar v. Harper Hospital, 313 Mich. 48, 20 N.W.2d 806; Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. Industrial Commission of Colorado, 124 Col. 217, 236 P.2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanderson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Hiber v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Hampton Roads Stevedoring Corporation v. O'HearneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  5. Erickson v. ToddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API