Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1936No. 11304PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

Marshall, the owner of a city lot, executed a lease thereof to Elliott, and thereafter brought a suit in equity to cancel the lease on the ground that he was induced to execute it by the fraud of the defendant.- The plaintiff prevailed, and the judgment was affirmed by this court. Elliott v. Marshall, 179 Ga. 639 (176 S. E. 770). The plaintiff had received from the defendant $175 in consideration of the lease. He alleged that he had tendered this sum, but that the tender had been declined, and that he made it a continuing tender. He did not pay the money into court; and a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Haygood v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Marshall v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Poole v. McEntireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Hadden v. FuquaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API