Legal Opinion

M.T. Associates v. Town of Randolph

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 2005No. 04-259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. The Town of Randolph appeals from a superior court decision which found it had violated the state and federal constitution by selectively reassessing taxpayer M.T. Associates’ property. The superior court concluded that the Town completed an unconstitutional partial reappraisal and, consequently, reset the value of taxpayer’s property at its assessed value for the previous year. We conclude that no unconstitutional reappraisal occurred, and that the Town’s decision to correct an error by reappraising only mini-marts was within its power. Therefore, we reverse the superior court and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Searles v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Kruse v. Town of WestfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. Alexander v. Town of BartonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Green v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beattie v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Garbitelli v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Barnett v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. Murdoch v. Town of ShelburneSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Big Foot Stores LLC v. Franklin Township AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API