Legal Opinion

McKnight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1992No. 90-03255PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Although we find no merit m appellant s contention that it was error to impose probation in sentencing him under the habitual offender statute, King v. State, No. 91-00036, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. The appellant waived presentation of the presentence investigation report but did ask that certified copies of the prior convictions be placed in the court file. The record does not indicate that certified copies of the prior convictions were produced, and therefore, there is no indication that the trial court made the required findings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Pankhurst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API